Cline vs opencode — local AI coding assistants
Cline vs OpenCode on install footprint, model and cost options, and approval workflow — from official docs, no lab benchmarks.
Tools compared
| Fact | Cline | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | vscode-extension | cli, desktop |
| Starting price | not listed | not listed |
| Price verified | not listed | not listed |
| Privacy notes | Bring your own model key, local or hosted. With hosted models your files and prompts go to that provider. | The vendor states OpenCode does not store code or context data. Model API keys you add are used directly with the providers you choose. |
Criteria
- resource-usage
- context-management
- cost-privacy
Verdict
Cline is the smoother pick inside VS Code and JetBrains, with per-action approval built in. OpenCode is the terminal-native pick, with free models included and any provider pluggable. Neither has been benchmarked by Devhok on the reference rig, so treat vendor performance claims with care.
Evidence
Sources
- cline/cline repository — GitHub, verified
- Cline official documentation — applications and model access — cline.bot, verified
- OpenCode homepage — product, pricing and privacy statements — Anomaly, verified
- OpenCode documentation — install, configure and usage — Anomaly, verified
This page was verified on .